• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

GAiT.Global

The Global Alliance for iPSC Therapies

  • About GAiT
    • About GAiT
    • Sponsors
      • NYSCF
      • KHiB
      • CCRM
      • INSERM / Cithera /INGESTEM
      • HKU
      • CGT
    • Support Us
  • News & Events
  • Publications
  • Workshops
  • iPSC Quality Assessment Rounds
    • iPSC Quality Assessment Round 2022/2023
      • iPSC Quality Assessment Round 2022 – Document Page
  • Directories
  • Clinical Database
  • Portal Login
You are here: Home / Replies /

Reply To: Establishing iPSCs under GMP conditions

· ·

Home › Forums › General Discussion › General Discussion › Establishing iPSCs under GMP conditions › Reply To: Establishing iPSCs under GMP conditions

24th October 2018 at 10:30 am #1226
Stephen SullivanStephen Sullivan
Keymaster

I was reviewing material for a document on the Quality Round GAiT is managing. I thought the following directly relevant so I reiterate here:

It is really important to engage your Regulator at the first possible juncture: many think that if they start with research materials can they be used for subsequent GMP work due to the rederivation of H9 ESCs from ‘research-grade’ to ‘clinical-grade’ and ‘clinical-grade H9 ESCs’ being in clinical trials.

That may not so easily be applied to iPSCs Tenneille Ludwig has learned, as they can be considered more highly manipulated and ESCs are minimally manipulated.  The rules for iPSCs may be different and what the community can do with ESCs may not so easily

This may be a problem for you, it may not, only your Regulator will know for sure.

Additionally talking to Regulator early is #1 recommendation from the UK Regenerative Medicine Platform Pluripotent Stem  Platform Workshop meeting in 2016.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27404768

  • This reply was modified 4 years, 5 months ago by Stephen SullivanStephen Sullivan.
  • This reply was modified 4 years, 5 months ago by Stephen SullivanStephen Sullivan.
  • This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by Stephen SullivanStephen Sullivan.

Primary Sidebar

Search Users

Forum Search

More results...

Search Forums
Sample Label 1
Sample Label 2
Sample Label 3
Filter by Topic Tags
banking requirements
cell culture automation iPSC manufacturing scale up
comparability iPSC therapeutic CQA critical quality attribute
critical quality attributes
critical quality attributes potency iPSC testing
Database design
database front end design
donor consent
efficacy
establishment gmp
GAiTpost newsletter
iPSC IP license
manufacturing cell substrates
manufacturing comparability
manufacturing scale up therapeutic development
Melboune
Melbourne
Personal data GDPR
QC manuscript
Quality Survey
regulation
standard value use cell therapy development
standardisation control cell therapy
test
Content from
Content to
Advanced Search

Secondary Sidebar

Recent Topics

  • Regulatory Considerations for clinical-grade iPSC
  • iPSC Quality Round 2019 – Amalgamated Primary Data Set
  • Donor Consent
  • Establishing iPSCs under GMP conditions
  • Testing for efficacy

Discussion Tags

banking requirements cell culture automation iPSC manufacturing scale up comparability iPSC therapeutic CQA critical quality attribute critical quality attributes critical quality attributes potency iPSC testing Database design database front end design donor consent efficacy establishment gmp GAiTpost newsletter iPSC IP license manufacturing cell substrates manufacturing comparability manufacturing scale up therapeutic development Personal data GDPR QC manuscript Quality Survey regulation standardisation control cell therapy standard value use cell therapy development

Invite Users to Site

Invite another user onto the GAiT Website
Invite Users

Social media

Follow us on social media

GAiT LinkedIn GAit Sound Cloud GAiT Twitter

 

 

Newsletter





© 2023 GAiT. All Rights reserved. Web Design by Conceptstore
  • Home
  • Portal Login